Spectrophotometric Investigations on Cephalosporines by Ellman’s
Reagent in Bulk and Dosage Forms
Sobhy M. El-Adl, Mohamed El. Hossinny El. Sadek , Marwa Hamdy
Hassan
Department of
Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Zagazige
University, Zagazig, Egypt
*Corresponding Author E-mail: elmohands_eg@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT:
An quantitative spectrophotometric method for determination of
cefotaxime Na and cefixime.
The developed method is based on the alkaline hydrolysis of the studied drugs
and subsequent reactions of the resulting hydrolysates
with DTNB as a chromogenic reagent which could be
used for their analysis in pure forms and in pharmaceutical formulations then
measuring absorbances at (417nm for cefotaxime and cefixime at 411
nm). The concentration of NaOH, DTNB concentration
and hydrolysis time were studied. Calibration curves were linear over ranges of
0.8–4 µg.ml-1 for Cefotaxime and 0.4- 2 µg.ml-1
for Cefixime. The methods were satisfactory
applied for the determination of drugs in both bulk and pharmaceutical dosage
forms and results were compared statistically with reference methods.
KEYWORDS: Cefotaxime, Cefixime,
NaOH, DTNB.
1. INTRODUCTION:
Cephalosporins, like all β-lactam
antibiotics, inhibit bacterial growth by interfering with a specific step in
bacterial cell wall synthesis (1). Cephalosporins consist of a fused β-lactam-A -dihydrothiazine
two-ring system, known as 7-amino cephalosporanic
acid (7-ACA) and vary in their side chain substituent at C3 (R2),
and C7 (acylamido, R1) (2). In this study Cefixime was determined spectrophotometically.
Several methods have been developed for its determination, including
spectrophotometric methods (6-3), high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) (11-7), Electro chemical methods (13-12).
Several methods have been developed for Cefotaxime
determination, including spectrophotometric methods (14-20),
high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (21-26), Electro
chemical methods (.27).
Many spectrophotometric methods were
developed for cephalosporins determinations that
based on hydrolysis of these drugs using alkaline degradation and subsequent
reaction of the formed sulphide ions with chromogenic reagents (28). Ellman's
reagent (DTNB) has been reported as reagent for determination of
amines, SH- and SS- group determination in proteins (29)
and for spectrophotometric determination of many compound.
Ellman's
reagent can be used for measuring low-molecular weight thiols
such as glutathione in both pure solutions and biological samples, such as
blood. (30)
On the basis of the aforementioned reasons,
it was thought to use this reagent for a quantitative spectrophotometric
determination of cefotaxime Na and cefixime. The developed method is based on the alkaline
hydrolysis of the studied drugs and subsequent reactions of the resulting hydrolysates with DTNB as a chromogenic
reagent which could be used for their analysis in pure forms and in
pharmaceutical formulations. This method is selective for cephalosporins
since other B-lactam antibiotics such as penicillins do not give sulphide
ions under the degradation conditions employed (31-32).
2. EXPERIMENTAL:
2.1. Apparatus:
Labomed®
Spectro UV-VIS Double Beam (UVD-2950) Spectrophotometer
with matched 1 cm quartz cells connected to windows compatible computer
using UV Win 5 Software v5.0.5. Spectronic Genesys®
UV-VIS Spectrophotometer connected to an IBM PC computer loaded with FLWINLAB
software. Consort P400® digital pH-meter for pH
adjustment.
2.2. Materials
and reagents:
All solvents and reagents were of
analytical grade and double distilled water was used throughout the work. Cefixime (Sigma-Egypt) Standard stock solutions 100 µg.ml-1
of cefixim was prepared by dissolving pure drug in 25 ml methanol, then
completed to
100 ml
with bidistilled water). Standard working
solutions 4µg.ml-1 of cefixime )was
prepared by taking 4 ml from stock solution and complete to 100 ml with bidistilled water). Cefotaxime Na
(Eipico -Egypt) Standard stock solutions 100 µg.ml-
of cefotaxime
was prepared by dissolving pure
drug in 100 ml bidistilled water. Standard working solutions 8µg.ml- 1 )was
prepared by taking 8 ml from stock solution and complete to 100 ml
with bidistilled water). 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic
acid)DTNB (Aldrich Chemical
Co. Ltd., Dorset, England freshly prepared 2.5x 10-4 M in 0.15M
phosphate buffer pH 7.2. Sodium hydroxide (El Nasr Chemical
Co. Cairo Egypt) 0.5M aqueous solution.
2.3.
Pharmaceutical preparations:
The following available preparations were analyzed
Ximacef® capsule labeled to contain 400 mg cefixime
per capsule. Batch No. 1240009 (Sigma, Egypt). Cefotax®
vial labeled to contain 250 mg cefotaxime Na per vial. Batch
No. 1204846 (Eipico, Egypt).
2.4. General spectrophotometric procedures and
construction of calibration curves using DTNB method:
Aliquot portions of the standard working solutions (0.1-0.5 ml) for
the two drugs was
transferred into 10-ml volumetric flask. 0.5 ml of 0.5 M NaOH
Was added and completed to volume with
bi-distilled water then put this content in test tube that are heated in water
bath at 90oC for 25 min then
cooled in tap water and left to take room temperature. One milliliter of the
resulting drug hydrolysate was pipetted
into 10ml volumetric flask 1.0 ml of 2.5x10-4 M DTNB was added .The
resulting solution was mixed well and the flask was completed to volume with
bi-distilled
water. The absorbance was
measured at 411 nm for cefixime and 417nm for cefotaxime against reagent blank that treated similarly.
2.4.3.
Procedures for pharmaceutical preparation:
For
Ximacef capsule: 10 capsules were weighed and powdered. An accurately amounts of the powder
equivalent to 10.8 mg of cefixime were dissolved in 25 ml of Methanol, filtered into
100-ml measuring flask and completed to volume with bidistilled
water to 100 ml .From the stock solution we make the standard working solution
and complete the procedures as previously mentioned under materials and
reagents and the general procedures. For
Cefotax vials, contents of one vial
were weighed. An accurate
amounts of the vial powder equivalent to 11.3 mg of cefotaxime
sodium were dissolved in bidistilled water in 100- measuring flask and completed to
volume with bidistilled water to 100ml .From the
stock solution we make the standard working solution and complete the
procedures as previously mentioned under materials and reagents and the general
procedures.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Some thiocompounds were previously reported to produce sulphide ions upon alkaline degradation and it was found to
be one of their major degradation product[148-149]. In
the proposed method thiols react with this compound,
cleaving the disulfide bond to give 2-nitro-5-thiobenzoate (TNB-),
which ionizes to the TNB2- dianion in
water at neutral and alkaline pH. This TNB2-
ion has a yellow color
(31)This reaction is rapid and stoichiometric,
with the addition of one mole of thiol releasing one
mole of TNB. The TNB2- is quantified in a spectrophotometer by
measuring the absorbance of yellow – coloured chromophore (λ max at 411nm for cefixime
or 417 nm for cefotaxime). The proposed reaction
mechanism is given as following (32) .
Figure.1.Suggested reaction mechanism between sulphide ions and DTNB (31-32)
All parameters were studied as follow:
3.1.-Absorption
spectra:
The
absorption spectrum of coloured product of cefixime and cefotaxime Na hydrolysates through the interaction with DTNB shows
absorption maximum at 411 nm and 417nm respectively (Fig.2).
Figure2. Absorption spectra of reaction product of cefixime (A) and cefotaxime (B)
with DTNB after hydrolysis by NaOH at maximum wave
length 411 nm. and 417nm respectively.
3.2. Effect of NaOH concentration:
The
influence of sodium hydroxide concentration on producing the maximum absorption
intensity was investigated using different volumes of 0.5 M NaOH.
The best volume was selected for further work (Fig.3) .
Figure
3. Effect of NaOH concentration on the absorbance of the reaction coloured product at 411 nm (cefixime)
or 417nm (cefotaxime ).
3.3. Effect of
hydrolysis time:
The effect
of hydrolysis time on the absorption intensity was studied using different
heating times in water bath at 90oC starting from 10 min to 1 hour.
The maximum absorption intensity was found to be 25 min and remained stable for
at least 60 min. as shown in (Fig 4)
3.4. Effect of DTNB concentration:
The volume
of 2.5x 10-4 DTNB for the maximum colour
development was varied in the range of 0.2 – 1.8 ml. It was found that 1 ml of DTNB was the
most suitable volume for determination as shown in (Fig.5) .
Figure
4. Effect of
hydrolysis time on the absorbance of the reaction colored product at 411nm (cefixime) or 417nm (cefotaxime).
Fig. 5-Effect of 2.5 X 10-4 M DTNB volume on the absorbance of the
reaction colored product at 411 nm (cefixime) or
417nm (cefotaxime).
3.5. Effect of
reaction time:
The
reaction between the investigated drug hydrolysates
and DTNB was very rapid but the interaction colored product can survive before
dilution unchanged only for 15 minutes.
3.6. Effect of temperature:
The effect of temperature on the absorption
intensity was studied using different temperatures in a water bath (25oC–100oC)
and the reaction was carried out as usual. The obtained absorbance readings
were plotted against temperature. The maximum absorption intensity was attained
at 90 oC as shown in (Fig.6).
4. METHOD
VALIDATION:
The developed
methods were validated according to international conference on harmonization
guidelines (33).The linearity
range of absorbance as a function of drug concentration (Table 1) provides good
indication about sensitivity of reagents used.
Figure
6. Effect of
temperature on the absorbance of the reaction colored product at 411 nm (cefixime)or 417nm (cefotaxime).
Calibration
curves have correlation coefficients (r)=0.999
indicating good linearity. The accuracy of the methods were
determined by investigating the recovery of drugs at concentration levels
covering the specified range (three replicates of each concentration). The
results showed excellent recoveries (table 2). Also, the Limit of detection
(L.D.), Limit of quantitation (L.Q.), Sandell’s sensitivity (S.S.) and Molar absorptivity
were calculated. The small values of SD and % RSD point to high precision of
the proposed method. Intra - day precision was evaluated by calculating
standard deviation (SD) of five replicate determinations using the same
solution containing pure drugs (table 6). The SD values revealed the high
precision of the methods. For inter - day reproducibility on a day - to - day
basis, a series was run, in which the standard drug solutions were analyzed
each for five days (table 6). Robustness was examined by evaluating the
influence of small variation of method variables including NaOH
concentration, DTNB concentration, heating temperature and heating time on the
method suitability and sensitivity. (Table 7) shows that none
of these variables significantly affects the performance of the method which
indicates robustness of the proposed method.
Table (1). Analytical parameters for the determination of cefixime and cefotaxime Na by
DTNB..
Cefixime |
Cefotaxime |
PARAMETERS |
411 |
417 |
Wave length ,
nm |
1 |
1 |
Volume of DTNB,
ml |
0.5 |
0.5 |
Volume of NaOH (0.5 M), ml |
25 |
25 |
Time of
hydrolysis min. |
90 |
90 |
Temperature oC |
0.4-2 |
0.8- 4 |
Beer's law
limits, µg/ml |
y=0.275x+ 0.161 |
y=0.194x+ 0.093 |
Regression
equation |
0.999 |
0.999 |
Correlation
Coefficient |
y = a + bx, where y is the absorbance, a is the intercept, b is the slope and
x is the concentration in μg/ml.
Table (2)
Determination of cefixime and cefotaxime
Na using DTNB method.
Parameters |
DTNB |
|||||
Cefotaxime |
Cefixime |
|||||
Taken µg/ml |
Found µg/ml |
Recovery % |
Taken µg/ml |
Found µg/ml |
Recovery % |
|
|
0.8 |
0.804 |
100.515 |
0.4 |
0.403 |
100.909 |
|
1.6 |
1.613 |
100.837 |
0.8 |
0.810 |
101.363 |
|
2.4 |
2.381 |
99.226 |
1.2 |
1.196 |
99.696 |
|
3.2 |
3.206 |
100.193 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
100 |
|
4 |
4..010 |
100.257 |
2 |
2.007 |
100.363 |
Mean |
|
|
100.206 |
|
|
100.34 |
±SD |
|
|
0.603 |
|
|
0.674 |
±RSD |
|
|
0.602 |
|
|
0.673 |
±SE |
|
|
0.269 |
|
|
0.301 |
Variance |
|
|
0.364 |
|
|
0.455 |
Slope |
|
|
0.194 |
|
|
0.275 |
L.D. |
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
0.13 |
L.Q. |
|
|
0.77 |
|
|
0.38 |
S.S. |
|
|
0.004 |
|
|
0.001 |
y = a + bx, where y is the absorbance, a is the intercept, b is the slope and x is the concentration in µg/ml.
Table (3) The proposed methods applied on cefixime
in the form of Ximacef® capsules compared with
reference method.
Parameters |
Methylene Blue method |
Methyl Orange method |
Reported method (24) |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Mean |
100.64 |
100.56 |
99.84 |
S D |
0.264 |
0.357 |
1.226 |
RSD |
0.514 |
0.598 |
1.226 |
SE |
0.510 |
0.594 |
0.550 |
Variance |
0.229 |
0.267 |
1.051 |
Student-t |
1.423 (2.57)a |
0.903 (2.57)a |
|
F-test |
4.58(6.256)b |
3.93(6.256)b |
|
a and b are the Theoretical Student
t-values and F-ratios at p=0.05.
Table (4).
Statistical analysis of results obtained by the proposed methods applied on Claritromycin in the Clarithro®
tablets compared with reference method.
Parameters |
Proposed method |
Reported method(24) |
N |
5 |
5 |
Mean |
100.409 |
99.99 |
S D |
0.532 |
0.851 |
RSD |
0.530 |
0.851 |
SE |
0.238 |
0.383 |
Variance |
0.283 |
0.735 |
Student-t |
0.931(2.57) a |
|
F-test |
2.597(6.256) b |
|
a and b are the Theoretical Student
t-values and F-ratios at p=0.05.
5. APPLICATIONS:
Some
Pharmaceutical formulations containing the stated drugs have been successfully
analyzed by the proposed methods. The reported reference method is based on the
alkaline hydrolysis of the drugs and subsequent reactions of the resulting hydrolysates with NBD-Cl
(4-Chloro-7-Nitro-2,1,3-BenzoxaDiazole) as a chromogenic reagent and detection at 401nm Results obtained
from proposed methods were compared to those obtained by applying reported
reference methods for cefixime (34) and cefotaxime Na
(34).where Student’s t-test and F-ratio were performed for comparison. Results
are shown in (table 4) where the calculated t and F values were less than
tabulated values which in turn indicate that there is no significant difference
between proposed methods and reference ones relative to accuracy and precision.
6. Conclusion:
Spectrophotometry is simple and
inexpensive. The proposed methods require sodium hydroxide and DTNB as reagents
which are readily available, and pH adjustment is required and the procedures
do not involve any critical reaction conditions or tedious sample preparation.
Moreover, methods are simple, moderately fast, accurate and adequately
sensitive. The recovery % obtained by the proposed methods was between 99.2%
and 101.3%, within the acceptance level 95% to 105%. The present methods are
superior to the reference method with respect to both sensitivity and
selectivity. The methods have been successfully applied for the analysis of
marketed cefotaxime Na vials and cefixime
capsules.
Table (5). The proposed methods applied on cefotaxime
in Cefotax®
vials compared with reference method..
Parameters |
Proposed method |
Reported method(24) |
N |
5 |
5 |
Mean |
100.161 |
99.75 |
S D |
0.735 |
1.620 |
RSD |
0.734 |
1.618 |
SE |
0.329 |
0.724 |
Variance |
0.541 |
1.450 |
Student-t |
0.517(2.57) a |
|
F-test |
2.680(6.256) b |
|
a and b are the Theoretical Student
t-values and F-ratios at p=0.05.
Table (6). Intraday and interday precision for the determination
of cefixime and cefotaxime Na
using DTNB
method.
Intraday and interday precision |
||||
Drug |
Intraday |
Interday |
||
mean of recovery ±SD |
RSD |
mean of recovery ±SD |
RSD |
|
Cefixime |
100.01±0.577 |
0.577 |
100.21±0.878 |
0.877 |
Cefotaxime Na |
100.02±0.599 |
0.599 |
100.9±0.71 |
0.71 |
Table (7). Robustness for the determination of cefixime, and cefotaxime Na using DTNB method.
Robustness |
|||
Parameters |
Cefixime |
Parameters |
Cefotaxime Na |
mean of recovery ±SD |
mean of recovery ±SD |
||
NaOH |
|
NaOH |
|
0.45M |
98.2±1.04 |
0.45M |
101.4±0.476 |
0.55M |
101.6±1.18 |
0.55M |
100.19±1.21 |
DTNB |
|
DTNB |
|
0.95ml |
100.6±0.69 |
0.95ml |
99.06±1.4 |
1.05ml |
99.05±0.69 |
1.05ml |
100±0.92 |
Temperature |
|
Temperature |
|
85oC |
100±0.92 |
85oC |
101.3±0.13 |
95˚C |
98.14±0.19 |
95 ˚C |
101.8±0.51 |
Time |
|
Time |
|
20min. |
101.92±0.77 |
20min. |
98.57±1.56 |
30min. |
101.47±52 |
30min. |
101.5±1.35 |
7. References:
1.
Delgado, J.; Remers,
W., Wilson and Gisvold's Textbook of Organic
Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry. 10th ed. New
York, (2004).
2.
Katzung, B., Basic and Clinical
Pharmacology. 8th ed., McGraw- Hill, Boston, MA, pp. 755 and 766., (2001).
3.
Naimul, S., Iqbal,
B., Hassan N., Quantitative analysis of cefixime via complexation with palladium in pharmaceutical formulation.
Pharmaceutical Analysis. 3 : 248–56 (2013).
4.
Ali, S., Elbashir, A.,
New spectrophotometric method for determination of cephalosporines.
Spectrochimica Acta. 60 :
2933–9(2011).
5.
Almomani, I., Irbid,
Y.,. Spectro-determination
of cephalosporines by flow injection analysis.
Pharmaceutical And Biomedical Analysis. 25, 751-7
(2001).
6.
Fattah, A.; alily, M.,
Spectro-determination of thiazole
cephalosporines. Pharmaceutical and Biomedical
Analysis. 22 : 385-92 (2000).
7.
Vladimirov, S., Eric, S., .HPTLC
determination of cefixime, ceftriaxone
and cefotaxime in their dosage forms. Pharmaceutical And Biomedical Analysis. 18: 893-8 (1988).
8.
Khan, A., Imran, M.,
Khan A. Simultaneous determination of cefdinr and cefixime in human plasms by
RP-HPLC/UV detection. Chromatography B. 879 : 2423-9
(2011)..
9.
Meng, F., Zhong,
D., Sensitive LC tandem mass spectrometry determination of cefixime
in human plasma. Chromatography B. 819 : 277-82
(2005).
10. Vladimirov, S., Zivanov,
D.,. Determination of cefixime
in biological samples by R-PH HPLC. Chromatography B. 422 :
148-52 (1957).
11. Nemutlu, E., Katlan,
D., .Simultaneous optimization of HPLC method to separate seven cephalosporines in plasma and in aminotic
fluid. Talanta. 80 : 117-25.
(2009)
12. Honda, S., Kakehi, K., Determination of cefixime
by capillary electrophoresis. Chromatography A. 590 :
364-8 (1999).
13. Memon, S., Khuhawar,
M., Qanitative analysis of eight cephalosporines
in pharmaceutical products and urine by capillary zone electrophoresis. Actachromatographia. 19 : 81-85
(2007).
14. Metwally F. H., Alwarthan
A., S. Al-Tamimi., Farmaco,
2001, 56(8), 601-7.
15. Ayad M. M., Shalaby
A. A., J. Pharmaceutical And Biomedical Analysis,
1999, 20 (3), 557-64.
16. Amin A., Ragab G. H.,
J. Spectrochimica Acta Part A, 2004, 60(12), 2831-6.
17. Salem H., Askal H., J. Pharmaceutical And
Biomedical Analysis, 2002, 29(1-2), 347-54.
18. Ayad M. M., Shalaby
A. A, J. Pharmaceutical And Biomedical Analysis, 1999,
18(6), 975-83.
19. Brisson A.M., Fourtillian
J.B., J. Chromatography B, 1981, 223(2), 393-9.
20. Bafeltowska J., Buszman E.,
J. Chromatography A, 2002, 976(1-2), 249-54.
21. Ling S.,
Barker S. A., J. Chromatography B, 2003, 783(1), 297-301.
22. Staki D., Jovanovic
S.E., J. Pharmaceutical And Biomedical Analysis, 1998,
18 (4-5), 893-8.
23. Hakim L.,
Bourne D.W., Chromatography B, 1988, 424, 111-7.
24. Hapeshi E.A., SamanldouV.F..,
J. Chromatography B, 2003, 788 (1), 147-58.
25. Sharma P.,
Chawla H., R.P, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical
Analysis, 2002, 27(1-2), 39-50.
26. Castaneda
G., Fabre H., J. Analytical Chemistry, 1997, 69 (7), 1364-9.
27. Jia Z.P., Wang R., Wang J., Pharmazie, 2009, 64 (3), 156-60.
28.
El-Walily A.F.M., Gazy A.A., J.
Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 1999, 20, 643-53.
29.
Elazazy
M.S., Shalaby A., Sci. Pharm., 2003, 71, 211-28.
30.
Al-, Momani I.F. Anal. Lett., 2004, 37, 2099-110.
31.
Riener C.
K., Kada G., Analytical And Bioanalytical
Chemistry, 2002, 373 (4-5), 266-76 .
32.
Alwarthan
A.A., Metwally F.H., Anal. Let.,
1993, 26, 2619-35.
33.
Guidance
for Industry, Q2B of Analytical Procedures Methodology: International
Conference on Harmonization (ICH). (1996) (http:/ www.fda.gov/eder/guidance
/1320fnl.pdf)
34. Nagegowda P., Basavaiah
K., J. Braz., Chemical Society, 2005, 16 (4), ISSN 0103-5053
Received on 09.11.2014 Accepted on 26.11.2014
© Asian Pharma
Press All Right Reserved
Asian J. Res.
Pharm. Sci. 4(4): Oct.-Dec.
2014; Page 196-201